Remaung6renjer

Nuffnang

Friday, November 1, 2013

Anak Taib Mahmud dapat kontrak tenaga RM600 juta dedah Pertubuhan Switzerland

Semenanjung Malaysia
1 Nov 2013

 Pendedahan Demi Pendedahan dibuat tetapi SPRM masih takut untuk bertindak terhadap Taib Mahmud.


Ketua Menteri Sarawak Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud (gambar) sekali lagi mencuri perhatian apabila satu lagi tuduhan yang dibawakan oleh Bruno Manser Fund (BMF) mendedahkan keluarganya mendapat faedah daripada projek kerajaan.
Syarikat yang mempunyai hubung kait dengan keluarga Abdul Taib telah dianugerahkan sebuah kontrak bernilai RM618.6 juta bagi membangunkan saluran empangan Sarawak Energy dimiliki kerajaan negeri mendapat kritikan kumpulan alam sekitar yang berpengkalan di Switzerland.

BMF sebelum ini lantang dalam kritikan terhadap polisi etnik di Sarawak berkata anak sulung Abdul Taib, Mahmud Abu Bekir adalah pengerusi Sarawak Cable Berhad (SCB) yang merupakan anak syarikat memperoleh kontrak tersebut.
"Menurut dokumen milik syarikat, Mahmud merupakan pengerusi SCB dan pemegang saham kedua terbesar dengan 33% (21% secara langsung dan 12% tidak langsung)," kata BMF.
Media semalam melaporkan, anak syarikat SCB, Trenergy Infrastructure Sdn Bhd telah menerima surat pelantikan dua projek pembekalan elektrik 500kV yang melintasi Mapai ke Lachau dan Lachau ke Tondong.
"Dua projek itu dijangka menyumbang kepada pendapatan bersih Kumpulan Sarawak Cable bagi tahun berakhir 31 Disember 2014 dan 2015," seperti dilaporkan SCB.
Empangan yang merupakan satu daripada 11 empangan yang dirancang pembinaannya oleh kerajaan negeri bakal menyaksikan 20,000 etnik Kenyah, Kayan dan Penan akan dipindahkan.
Penduduk kampung telah menjalankan bantahan dan sekatan di sekitar kawasan Empangan Baram bagi menghalang pekerja Sarawak Energy memasuki kawasan tersebut.
"Penduduk kampung berjaya menghalang pekerja Sarawak Energy dari melakukan kerja tinjauan di Empangan Baram," menurut Straumann.
Media turut memetik Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) Telang Usan, Dennis Ngau berkata keadaan di sana semakin tegang dan tiada sebarang petanda melihatkan penduduk kampung untuk beralah.
Beliau melahirkan kebimbangan masalah itu akan bertukar kepada konfrontasi dan menggesa tindakan segera perlu dilakukan.
"Hentikan kerja pembinaan sehingga notis lanjut dikeluarkan. Jangan menentang penduduk kampung. Biarkan kami yang menyelesaikan masalah ini," katanya yang merujuk kerja menebuk batu di antara Long Naah dan Long Kesseh kira-kira 200 kilometer dari bandar Miri.
Beliau turut meminta Sarawak Energy, kakitangan pejabat tanah dan Jabatan Ukur Tanah meninggalkan kawasan itu dengan kadar segera. – 31 Oktober, 2013.

Mupok Aku


 

Temple Refurbishment In Kelang : Go to Hell With Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma)



West Malaysia
 1 Nov 2013

Just wonder why ISMA bothered about the house of worship of other Religions?

The Sri Sundararaja Perumal temple in Klang has come under attack from Muslim NGO Isma for refurbishment work. - The Malaysian Insider pic file, October 31, 2013."Let them make all the noise they want, it is getting quite common here in Malaysia." This was the response from the president of the 130-year-old Sri Sundararaja Perumal temple in Klang which has now come under attack from a Muslim non-governmental organisation protesting the refurbishment work.
Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma) had said that the refurbishment of the temple in the centre of Klang town would create a negative impression among Muslim tourists who visit Malaysia.
The group was also concerned with a report that the temple was poised to become a landmark and tourist attraction in Klang.
But temple president S. Anandakrishnan was unperturbed by Isma's concerns, adding he was "not bothered with what certain groups had to say".
"Who are they to comment anyway? We got our own funding, we did not take any money from the government. Freedom of religion is enshrined in the Federal Constitution.
"And by the way, the structure was completed two weeks ago. All that is left is the statues and the dome which will be ready in 12 months," said Anandakrishnan, adding that the decorative granite stones from India had also been assembled two weeks ago.
According to him, the Sri Sundararaja Perumal temple was being refurbished with funding from prominent and wealthy Indians. Even judges worship at this temple, he said.
"We also received support from multi-national companies, so we are not bothered about what they (Isma) say," he said.
Anandakrishnan said the consecration of the temple is slated for June 2015, and that workers from India will be arriving in a week's time to work on the dome.
Isma president Abdullah Zaik Abdul Rahman had called on the government to take the necessary steps to ensure harmony and to protect Malaysia's image in the eyes of the international Muslim community.
Klang MP Charles Santiago labelled Isma as an extension of Perkasa, saying that the Muslim NGO wanted to act like it was the custodian of Islam.
Santiago said Isma should reserve their comments as the rebuilding of the temple was privately funded.
"Muslim religious bodies should make a stand against groups like Isma who do not appreciate the concept of freedom of religion," he said, adding that Malaysia stood to gain if the temple was promoted as a tourist attraction.
"What could possibly be wrong with that? Isma is just being ridiculous.
"They want to show they are the custodians of the religion. They are essentially an extension of Perkasa," Santiago said.
Abdullah also said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had pledged to uphold the teachings of Islam and, as such, plans to rebuild certain houses of worship for tourism purposes went against this pledge.
This was Isma's second outburst against Hindus in the past one week.
They also came on strongly on the issue of cows being slaughtered in schools when they warned Hindu parents to back off with their demands that schools not be used for such rituals.
"Why should we bow to pressure from them (Hindus)? It is as if we do not have our own identity. This is our country and it is an Islamic country," Isma's deputy president Aminuddin Yahaya was quoted as saying.
"We want to slaughter cows, who cares? What is the percentage of the Indian community in Malaysia? Only 1% or 2%. The Malays were over 60% of the population."
Aminuddin was referring to Hindu parents who were among others who were against school grounds being used to slaughter cows, considered sacred to Hindus, during the recent Hari Raya Haji celebrations.
Isma had also criticised the recent construction of the Calvary Church Convention Centre in Kuala Lumpur that is touted as the largest church building in Southeast Asia.
The Pentecostal church is 600,000sq ft in area and has a 5,000 seat auditorium, as well as a multi-purpose hall, a nursery, lecture halls, and classrooms. – October 31, 2013.

Mupok Aku


 

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

‘Allah’ issue about Malayisation and Islamisation of Malaysia

West Malaysia Tuesday,
29 Oct 2013

Religious Supression in Malaysia


Nesrine Malik of The Guardian hit the nail on the head when she said the Allah ban “is less about religion than about putting the non-Malay minorities in their place . . .”
It’s about Umno-Malays domination and their claim to the exclusive right to set the country’s agenda, riding roughshod over the concerns of the minorities.
Religion is used as a convenient tool because Islam and Malay identity are inseparable. Rather than use the ethnic dichotomy to pit the Malays against the non-Malays, which has lost its punch as more and more Malays (especially the urban Malays) have grown wise to Umno Baru-BN’s trick of pitting the races against each other (GE13 is proof enough), Umno now exploits the Muslim/non-Muslim dichotomy. Umno has decided that this is an even better tool as it gives it an air of Divine Will, an act sanctioned by Allah.
The Allah issue is a guise to hide Umno Baru’s agenda which is the Malayisation of the country. This is not the first time that Umno has tried to turn Malaysia’s multicultural identity into a Malay identity.
It’s about Ketuanan Melayu. It’s about institutional racism. It’s about putting the ‘pendatangs’ in their place; people who should be grateful with what they are given, ‘guests’ who should know their place. And for those who don’t (know their place) they are shown the exit – they have been reminded enough times lately by ministers, politicians and Malay NGOs.
We do not have to dig too deep into our past to see the many attempts Umno has made to remodel our multicultural national identity, and as religion and race are tied with regard to the Malays, Islam is part and parcel of this identity.
Let us look at the Umno-BN government’s track record to see this pattern of Malayisation and Islamisation of the country.
(I say the Umno-BN government, because the non-Malay component parties – MCA, MIC, Gerakan – are complicit to the plot if only by their acquiescence).
Islamisation and suppression of other religions
Even before the introduction of its Islamisation programme in 1982, the government has been promoting Islamic values as the country’s values while ignoring the values or contributions of others in this multiracial country. It was as if there was only one set of values – the Islamic one.
“It is important that we prove that the Islamic system can fulfill the needs of not only the Muslims but other communities as well” said Dr Mahathir Mohamad (New Straits Times, 18 March 1985)
To leave nothing in doubt, Mahathir went on to say: “I hope we will not waste any effort shouting slogans which sound nice to the ears but empty in content. Instead we should go gradually forward in implementing Islamic principles.” (The Star, 2 August 1985).
Hence the process of Islamisation took hold and was fast paced in government, administration, and education. This has caused great anxiety among the non-Muslims not because they were anti-Islam but because this undermines the basic foundation of Malaysia as a secular nation where there is religious freedom with Islam as the official religion.
The Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code were amended in 1982 ostensibly to deal with ‘deviant’ Islamic teachings (anything that is not in keeping with the government’s version of Islam). However it also allows for “state interference in the practice, profession and propagation of non-Muslim religions”. (Lim Kit Siang – Malaysia Crisis of Identity, page 39). This was another nail in the coffin of religious freedom in Malaysia.
In education, ‘Islamic Civilisation’ was made a compulsory subject in universities. While the non-Muslims accepted that it was good that they come to understand Muslims better through this subject, their proposal that, for the same reason the study of other major religions’ civilisations can help Muslims understand the non-Muslims, was ignored.
The process of Islamisation was also felt in schools. There was an increase in government control of schools, especially of the mission schools. Before long, the principals of mission schools – who were traditionally Christians – were replaced by Muslim principals and principals of other faiths.
In the early 1980s, Moral Education as a compulsory examination subject was introduced for non-Muslim pupils while Muslim pupils were taught the Koran. The suggestion by the Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) that it was only fair that “Pupils Own Religion” (POR) be taught was rejected. (It should be noted that in Indonesia POR is provided for all pupils and no religion has advantage over the other yet Indonesia is the largest Muslim nation with an overwhelming Muslim majority).
What further alienated non-Muslim parents was that the majority of the Moral Education teachers were Muslims and as such there would be a natural bias towards Islam.
Other acts of Islamisation in schools included instructing mission schools to remove crucifixes from the building and the removal of the cross or any other Christian symbols from their school badge and replace it with a star or a crescent.
In Sabah the authorities banned the teaching of Christianity on the school premises even after school hours. Because of strong protests this ban was lifted.
The doa is now recited in all school assemblies something which even the missionary schools did not do in my time.
The Islamisation of the education system has been going on for years. The Deputy Prime Minister at that time, Anwar Ibrahim, said in a press statement that the changes brought about by the government in the education system were in line with Islam. (New Straits Times, 26 March 1994).
I wonder what is Anwar’s present position on this today?
Places of worship
The discrimination and suppression of other religions took many forms.
Regarding places of worship, it was recommended that Muslims be given an allocation ratio of 1:800 population with a spatial requirement of 0.4 hectare for a mosque. For a surau, it is 1:250 and 0.1 hectare. For non-Muslims the ratio was 1:4000 with a spatial requirement of “suitable standards” for a church or temple.
MCCCBHST request that they be treated equally was rejected. However the “suitable standards” was made more specific. Non-Muslims were now allocated 0.2 hectare – half that of the Muslims’. In fact, it is less when considering the ratio remained 1:4000 which is five times the number of people required for a mosque.
Another form of discrimination and suppression was by refusing or making it extremely difficult for non-Muslims to get planning approval for their places of worship. Land was not allocated for places of worship for non-Muslims and burial grounds not provided for in the master plans of some of the new towns.
The Sultan of Selangor commented in 1984 that while he was happy to see many suraus and mosques in the state, he aired his unhappiness that there was not a single place of worship for non-Muslims in Shah Alam. He wondered aloud, tongue-in-cheek no doubt, if non-Muslims ever prayed. He further observed that although land for places of worship for non-Muslims had been identified, its conversion had been stopped, “. . . perhaps by the state government or the Selangor State Development Corporation (PKNS)” (The Star, 17 January 1984).
The Shah Alam Church of Divine Mercy (often dubbed “the-on-and-off church) is probably the most famous example of how the authorities try to thwart attempts by non-Muslims to build places of worship.
The Catholic Church had applied for a piece of land to build a church in 1977. A 1.116 acre was allocated by the state and sold to the church in 1985 after the Sultan of Selangor’s much publicised comments.
Formal approval to build a church was given in May 1993. Work started on the church in Section 24 of Shah Alam in June the same year.
Almost immediately Muslim NGOs and politicians protested claiming that the church would challenge the sanctity of Islam as the country’s official religion and the position of Muslims. The Menteri Besar Muhammad Muhammad Taib instructed the municipal council to withdraw the approval.
It would be too tedious to go through the details of this saga. Suffice to say the government gave in to the Muslim extremists and offered the church a new site at Lot 172, Jalan Pemaju amongst the factories in the Industrial Park.
The Church of Divine Mercy opened its doors 28 years later in September 2005 after navigating every obstacle the government could throw in its way.
The continued reluctance by local authorities and state governments to cater to the needs of non-Muslims is probably the cause of the sprouting up of ‘shophouse churches’ and temples.
Administrative roadblocks on non-Muslims
Other examples of the State’s actions vis-a-vis non-Muslims include: lack of burial ground, the propagation of Islam to non-Muslim minors despite strong parental objections. The conversion of 17-year-old Susie Teoh is a case in point. Her conversion to Islam was challenged by her father Teoh Eng Huat who appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn the verdict of the Kota Bharu High Court that parents have no right to determine the religion of their children. Apparently this is contrary to reading of the law by Tun Mohammed Suffian Hashim (the late Lord President) that the religion of a minor under the age of 18 is decided by his/her parent or guardian.
Cases of dubious conversions persists to this day including cases of alleged ‘body snatching’ – when the state religious department take corpses for Muslim burial despite the protests of family members and evidence that they were practising other religions – Hinduism in most cases.
The import of Al-kitab, the Bible in the Indonesian language, was banned under the ISA in 2 Dec 1981. This was lifted after the churches protested.
The prohibition of the use of certain words deemed exclusive to Islam is not something new. State governments in Perak, Selangor, Kelantan and Terengganu in the 1980s issued a list of 36 words, including ‘Allah’ that non-Muslims were forbidden to use. After the MCCBCHST protested the list was pruned down to four words (Allah, solat, Kaabah and Baitullah). The Christian leaders refused even this list on the principle that no government has the right to forbid anyone to use any word of any language on earth.
So the banning of the use of ‘Allah’ is not something new. It is worth noting that the non-Muslims have consistently refused to accept this ban.
The Immigration Department also did its part in suppressing other religions by making it difficult for priests to enter the country. This affected the Buddhists, Sikhs and Hindus greatly as they needed the priests to conduct religious ceremonies and there were not enough local priests.
Sabah and Sarawak are not exempt
If those in Sabah and Sarawak think that it’s only about the ‘A’ word, that they are free from this suppression they should look back on the government’s track record in their states.
The Sacred Heart Cathedral in Kota Kinabalu is the most famous case.
Some Muslims in Sabah had objected to the rebuilding the Sacred Heart Cathedral that would have been the biggest Roman Catholic church in the Sabah when completed. The old church had been demolished so that a new one could be built in the same design as the St Joseph’s Cathedral in Kuching and able to accommodate a congregation of some 1,380 in a single sitting.
In Sandakan, Sabahan Muslims objected to the building of a Buddhist temple in Kampung Tanah Merah. The then Sabah Deputy Chief Minister Chong Kah Kiat resigned over the issue of Maru, a Goddess of the Sea statue in Kudat, Sabah, for which approval was granted but later withdrawn when Muslim extremists protested.
In Sarawak, the Sikhs were attacked for building a gurdwara in Kuching.
The letting in of Muslim immigrants into Sabah is as much a political issue as it is a religious issue. It is to change the ethnic and religious balance in the state – to create a Muslim majority which can in turn impose restrictions on other religions just like in West Malaysia.
East Malaysians accept the government’s assurance on the use of Allah at their own peril. The problem goes beyond the use of one word. It is a problem of Malayisation and Islamisation.
While all religions are affected by the government’s ban on the use of ‘Allah’ and other restrictions and discrimination, it is the Christians who are the main target of Umno’s politics. This was made clear by the Minister for Tourism and Culture Nazri Abdul Aziz who told other religions to butt out of this controversy. “I hope non-Christian groups won’t get involved in this matter. It is between us Muslims and the Christians. This is very sensitive.” ( Malaysiakini, 21 Oct 2013)
Malayisation
It’s not just religion but also other issues that the Umno-led government has shown its intolerance to diversity.
In 1971, a Congress on National Culture was held at the University of Malaya. On the face of it there is nothing wrong with trying to forge a national identity, especially if every culture in the country is included.
“Malaysia’s multi-cultural society cannot be forgotten in deciding the country’s culture…” (Straits Times, 18 Aug 1971).
Two days later, the Straits Times editorial while opining that establishing a national culture is laudable, asked “how the component parts can be welded into a whole as an integral part of national identity. It is easier said than done. Culture does not lend itself easily to guidance or legislation” (Straits Times, 18 Aug 1971)
Home Affairs Minister Ghazali Shafie later gave us a glimpse of the government’s idea of the ‘national culture’ when he said “. . . attempts by the immigrant races to defend and promote some of their cultural elements which were already extinct in their countries of origin were futile and a waste of time…” (Straits Times, 20 May 1979), and he gave the example of the Lion Dance. (The lion dance extinct in China? That’s news).
In tune with government policy, the police in 1982 refused permission for lion dances to be performed in public, saying that under government directives they were only allowed during Chinese New Year even though that particular directive had been lifted. Ghazali later as Foreign Minister said that only characteristics of art which are based on the Malay identity and Islam could be accepted as elements of the national culture: “In this respect there should be no give-and-take” (Straits Times, 9 Oct 1982). The Umno-led government’s position on this was non-negotiable.
Encouraged by the federal government’s position, state governments began to remove signboards with Chinese characters until reminded that other languages were permitted as long as the Malay translation was featured prominently. Despite the federal government’s rule on signage, in 1987 municipal workers were directed to black out Chinese characters on signboards at the Johor Seafood Carnival. This caused an uproar.
In line with Umno’s agenda for Malay-centric national culture, the Director-General of Education Murad Mohammed Noor issued a circular to all principals detailing what was permissible in school cultural shows (8 Aug 1984). Such activities had to reflect the National Cultural Policy.
The activities that were allowed:
(1) dances like the inang, zapin, joget, kuda kepang, ballet (so, ballet is indigenous to Malay culture),
(2) musical instruments like the gamelan and kompang,
(3) traditional games like gasing, congkak and wau, and 4. traditional theatre such as makyong, bangsawan and boria.
Other activities which highlighted ‘foreign’ cultures or do not reflect the national culture were not allowed.
Another act by the government to suppress non-Malay cultures and heritage include the attempt to acquire Bukit Cina cemetery in Malacca together with the Cheng Hoon Teng Temple which is the oldest in Malaysia (1704). The ostensible purpose of this state acquisition was to level it for development. But it would also get rid of a non-Malay non-Islam heritage.
The temple trustees resisted. Before long, this became a national controversy as Chinese throughout the country supported the stand of the temple.
Rehman Rashid, a columnist for the New Straits Times had asked ‘So what’s another hill’ (5 Oct 1984), displaying his insensitivity to the significance of the hill to the Chinese as representing the link to their ancestors’ arrival in this country (certainly earlier than the arrival of many ‘Malays’).
And more significantly, a symbol of the friendship between the Chinese and the Malays when the Emperor of China gave his daughter Hang Li Po to Sultan Mansur Shah in marriage.
The controversy raged on for some time before the government relented in the face of nationwide protest.
It’s ironic that the Chinese who are noted for their materialistic and pragmatic attitude had rallied round a symbol. On the other hand the Malays who were thought to be unmaterialistic wanted to enrich themselves from a prime piece of real estate which just happened to be the ancestral graves of the earliest Chinese to Malaya.
East Malaysians took note of what was happening in West Malaysia.
The then Chief Minister of Sabah Joseph Pairin Kitingan warned against cultural assimilation and the domination of one race over others ( New Straits Times, 11 Aug 1986). Edward Jeli, the Sarawak State Minister for Land Development, said that to lose one’s culture would be tantamount to losing one’s identity. (Sarawak Tribune, 16 Oct 1986).
The fight for cultural identity did not involve only the Chinese, In April 1984, ten Indian associations sent a collective memorandum to the Ministry of Culture Youth and Sports making clear their unhappiness that there are
“ politicians, government servants, academicians and religious leaders who have already decided for themselves the future status of Malaysia as an Islamic State. Consequently their concept of national culture is one of Islamic Culture alone. In their concept the cultural values of the other communities have little or no relevance. They are prepared to ride roughshod over the sentiments and sensitivities of the other communities. The influence of this group is by no means small. It is being felt in a number of ways”.
The memorandum went on to the following areas of concern:
1. Pressuring non-Muslims to wear Malay/Muslim attire
2. Showing little or no concern about the cultural practices of others
3. Creating obstacles for others to develop their cultures, religions and languages
4. Discriminating on the basis of religion
5. Condoning Islamic extremism
6. Ridiculing other religions
7. Laying down standards of personal behaviour and morality for others
8. Pushing Islamic indoctrination
9. Propagating the slogan of one language, one religion, one race
10. Supporting cultural assimilation rather than integration
One should ask if indeed a ‘national culture’ that is politically determined and legislated is desirable, and if that is possible even. Should not a national culture in a multiracial nation spring from the mingling of the different communities and take on aspects of the different cultures? Are we only ‘truly Asia’ on billboards and TV commercials?
A commentary in the New Straits Times of 1 July 1992 by journalist-writer Salleh ben Joned summed it up nicely when he said “Rojak is good for nation building.”
Conclusion
From the preceding paragraphs it is obvious what Umno’s real goal is. It’s not 1Malaysia unless One Malaysia means one race, one culture, one religion.
Umno has never repudiated its agenda of cultural assimilation, Islamisation or Ketuanan Melayu. It has never stopped trying to “put the non-Malays in their place”. It desists temporarily in the face of strong opposition by the non-Malays only to try again and again. This latest controversy about the use of ‘Allah’ is just another episode in Umno’s quest to Islamise and Malayise the country.
Prime Minister Najib Razak’s allowance for Sabah and Sarawak to use ‘Allah’ is only because his government depends on both these states to survive. East Malaysians should not lull themselves into thinking that there is a change of heart. It’s just a change of tactic. What Umno tried to do in the 1970s and 1980s it will try to do again . . . and again.
The fact that the Umno-led government has veered so far to the right, pandering to extremist groups like Perkasa, religious extremist groups like Ikatan Muslimim Malaysia (ISMA) and economic opportunists (including non-Malays) is most disconcerting. What happened to the multiracial, multicultural, tolerant and inclusive nation that was Malaya and later Malaysia? While Malay dominance is a fact of life, it must not be to the detriment of the other races. There must be no institutional racism disguised as affirmative action or Malayisation in the guise of a fabricated national culture.
A Malaysia where the non-Malays are not allowed to play their full part as equal citizens will be a poorer Malaysia – economically and culturally.
To paraphrase the late opposition leader Dr Tan Chee Koon, we (the 51.7% of Malaysians) must not throw up our hands and ask “Apa Boleh Buat”, taking what is dished out to us by Umno lying down. We must be positive, stand on our principles and not move from our position of what is fair. The majority of Malaysians (going by GE13) want a multiracial, tolerant and fair Malaysia as envisioned by the founding fathers of our nation.
There was a time when Malays, Chinese and Indians mixed freely. We sat in coffee shops together, called at each other’s house (not just on ‘open house days’), our children played together. I remember Malays classmates without tudungs (that did not make them any less decent). A uniquely Malaysian culture would have evolved in time given the chance. Indeed “rojak is good for nation building”
Malaysians must not allow the racial and religious extremists to call the tune.
Mupok Aku

 

Muhyiddin Celupar Terpaksa Minta Maaf daripada Keluarga Allahyarham Azizan



Malaysia Barat 
Tuesday, 29 Oct 2013

Muhyiddin Dimalukan di Seluruh Malaysia. Kerana Tidak Peka Dipaksa Meminta Maaf daripada keluarga Allahyarham Azizan



Timbalan Perdana Menteri Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin berkata, beliau meminta maaf sekiranya beliau menghina keluarga bekas menteri besar Tan Sri Azizan Abdul Razak dalam ucapannya di Sungai Limau pada hari Sabtu lalu.

Katanya, beliau telah meneliti rakaman ucapannya dan berpendapat bahawa ucapan itu tidak bersifat menghina kerana beliau hanya membincangkan mengenai Bajet 2014 yang diumumkan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak.



Katanya, beliau berharap agar keluarga Azizan, yang berpengaruh besar di kawasan DUN Sungai Limau, akan memaafkannya dan melupakan kejadian tersebut.

"Bukan tujuan saya untuk orang kata mencemarkan nama baik Allahyarham atau merendah-rendahkanny atau memperkecilkannya.

azlan


"Tapi apapun saya sebutkan sebagai manusia, kalau kenyataan itu disalah atfsirkan atau menyinggung perasaan keluarga, saya minta maaf kalau silap salah tapi tujuannya tak begitu," katanya.

Muhyiddin ketika ditemui pemberita di Bukit Choras, Sungai Limau juga berharap agar insiden berkenaan tidak akan terus digunakan sebagai bahan kempen untuk pilihan raya kecil tersebut.


Beliau turut meminta agar kenyataannya yang dirakam dalam video tersebut disemak semula.
"Pegawai saya pun mengesahkan nada saya pun bukan macam orang kata itu," katanya.

Beliau mendakwa, perkara sebaliknya berlaku apabila kenyataannya dilaporkan dalam satu portal berita.
Perkara itu menyebabkan naib presiden PAS Datuk Mahfuz Omar menuntut beliau agar meminta maaf.
Keluarga Allahyarham juga semalam menuntut beliau meminta maaf atas kenyataannya pada hari Sabtu lalu.

Anak kelima Azizan, Mohd Rafi'ie Azizan, 32 tahun pada sidang media di pusat operasi PAS semalam berkata anggota keluarga mereka begitu terguris hati dengan kenyataan Muhyiddin itu.


"Air mata kami sekeluarga belum kering mengenangkan Allahyarham ayahanda dan kerinduan kami kepada ayahanda masih menyelubungi setiap detik yang kami lalui," Rafi'ie.

Muhyiddin pada hari Sabtu lalu  mempertahankanpengurangan subsidi gula sebanyak 34 sen yang diumumkan kerajaan dalam pembentangan Bajet 2014.
NONE
Menurutnya, ia dilakukan untuk manfaat orang ramai dan hadirin yang hadir perlu mengambil iktibar daripada penyakit kencing manis yang dideritai Azizan.
 
Azizan terpaksa menjalani pembedahan memotong kedua-dua belah kakinya akibat komplikasi penyakit kencing manis. 

Pilihan raya kecil tersebut diadakan susulan kekosongan kerusi selepas Azizan yang juga penyandang kerusi DUN Sungai Limau meninggal dunia pada 26 September lalu.

Komen Bukittunggal:- Tanda awal kekalahan BN di Sungai Limau.



Mupok Aku

 

Pilihanraya Kecil Sungai Limau : UMNO Beli Undi Cina




Malaysia Barat
Tuesday, 29 Oct 2013

 Cina Sungai Limau Boleh Dijual-Beli? Sama-sama kita nantikan keputusan pilihanraya kecil itu nanti!






Kenyataan Menteri Besar Kedah Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir sebelum ini yang dilihat tidak mengutamakan penduduk Cina kerana sokongan mereka kepada Pakatan Rakyat dalam pilihan raya umum lalu, mungkin menjadi bahan bualan di kalangan pengamal media.

Namun, di peringkat akar umbi, penduduk Cina Sungai Limau nampaknya lebih fokus kepada sejauh mana kerajaan negeri boleh membantu mereka menjalankan perniagaan padi dengan lebih baik.


NONE

Pedagang padi, Ho Siang Huat (kanan), 53, misalnya mahu harga jualan padi kepada Beras Nasional (BERNAS) dinaikkan kepada RM147 per 100 kilogram seperti di Thailand, berbanding harga sekarang RM102 sahaja untuk jumlah sama.

"Kami akan undi sesiapa sahaja yang boleh bantu naikkan harga padi seperti di Thailand," katanya sewaktu ditemui di Dulang Besar semalam.

"Kami sekarang menunggu jika Mukhriz ada sebarang pengumuman besar buat kami."

Ditanya siapa yang akan diundi penduduk Cina Sungai Limau, Ho berkata mereka akan mengikut arahan penghulu komuniti mereka yang dijangka akan mengadakan mesyuarat 'rahsia' untuk menentukan pilihan mereka.

"Cina di Sungai Limau ini bersatu. Apabila diarah untuk undi parti tertentu, kami undi. Itu caranya di sini," katanya sambil menambah arahan tersebut paling awal akan diketahui pada 2 November ini.

Tan: 3 anak saya tak laku 


NONE

Naib Presiden MCA, Datuk Chor Chee Heung (kanan) sebelum ini berkata terdapat 1,827 pengundi Cina di kawasan majoriti Melayu di Sungai Limau.

Namun katanya, hanya 10 peratus atau kira-kira 180 orang mengundi BN dalam pilihan raya umum lalu walaupun jumlah anggota MCA di Sungai Limau adalah 965 orang.

Dengan anggapan tidak ramai pengundi Melayu menukar sokongan mereka selepas pilihan raya yang lalu, pengundi Cina kini mempunyai peranan penting untuk menentukan siapa yang bakal menang di Sungai Limau.

PAS sebelum ini mempertahankan kerusi Sungai Limau dengan majoriti sebanyak kira-kira 2,774 undi sahaja.



Buat pesawah padi, Tan Siew Boon (bawah), 90, hidup beliau tidak banyak berubah sama ada bawah pentadbiran BN atau PAS.


NONE
Menurut ibu kepada 8 orang anak itu, beliau pernah memohon bantuan kerajaan negeri kira-kira setahun lalu untuk memperbaiki rumahnya.

Namun, menurutnya, bantuan yang dipohon daripada kerajaan negeri PAS itu tidak kunjung tiba.

"Hidup kami sudah begini sejak beberapa generasi dan rasanya tak ada apa-apa akan berubah," katanya yang telah mendiami rumahnya di tengah-tengah sawah sejauh kira-kira dua kilometer dari jalan utama, selama tiga generasi.

Beliau bersama anaknya mengusahakan 7 ekar tanah yang disewa pada harga RM600 untuk satu musim.

Menurut Tan, kehidupan mereka hanya ala kadar namun tidaklah begitu selesa sehinggakan tiga anak lelakinya "tidak laku" kerana gadis-gadis sekarang mahukan lelaki yang ada rumah dengan tanah di pekan.

Menurut Tan lagi, beliau juga akan menunggu arahan penghulu untuk mengundi parti yang mana satu dalam pilihan raya umum pada 4 November ini.

'Azizan di atas nampak'

Berbeza dengan Tan, seorang peniaga perabot dan barangan elektrik yang hanya mahu dikenali sebagai Mr Ang tanpa berselindung memberitahu beliau akan mengundi PAS.

Menurutnya, bekas wakil rakyat sebelum ini, Tan Sri Azizan Abdul Razak seorang personaliti luar biasa yang ringkas dan mudah didekati.



Ditanya lebih lanjut sebab beliau akan terus mengundi PAS, Ang (kanan) berkata: 

NONE

"Azizan di atas sana akan nampak kalau kita tak mengundi dia."

Ia mengundang ketawa besar daripada tujuh rakan-rakannya yang turut sama hadir sewaktu temubual dijalankan.

Hari membuang undi bagi jatuh pada 4 November dan pilihan raya kecil ini yang diadakan selepas Azizan meninggal dunia pada 26 September lalu menyaksikan pertandingan satu lawan satu antara PAS dan BN.




(Dipetik dari Malaysiakini)

Mupok Aku


 

Rahsia Sebenar Kenaikan Harga Gula




Malaysia Barat
Tuesday, 29 Oct 2013

  Rahsia kenaikan harga gula oleh kerajaan BN terbongkar!








Pengurangan subsidi gula sebanyak 35 sen setiap kilogram yang diumumkan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak pada Bajet 2014 adalah disebabkan kerajaan telah menandatangani perjanjian mengimport gula mentah dengan harga yang terlalu tinggi, kata DAP.
Setiausaha Publisiti Kebangsaan DAP Tony Pua (gambar) berkata pada Januari 2012, Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Penggunaan dan Koperasi, Datuk Ismail Sabri telah mengumumkan bahawa kerajaan menandatangani perjanjian tiga tahun untuk mengimport gula mentah dengan harga US$26 setiap 100lbs berbanding harga pada ketika itu, US$23.42. 
“Saya telah mengeluarkan kenyataan mengkritik kerajaan ketika itu kerana kerajaan membeli gula mentah dengan harga lebih mahal daripada harga pasaran.
“Perbezaan harga kontrak melebihi 10% daripada harga pasaran menyebabkan kerajaan terpaksa menanggung kerugian sebanyak RM64 juta setiap tahun. Saya juga pada masa itu telah menyarankan kepada kerajaan bahawa laporan penganalisis antarabangsa meramalkan harga gula akan menurun akibat pengeluaran gula mentah yang terlampau tinggi. 
“Tetapi, perkara ini tidak dihiraukan oleh kerajaan malah Timbalan Menteri Perdagangan Antarabangsa, Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir membidas dengan berkata harga gula mentah dunia dijangka terus meningkat pada masa hadapan,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan media hari ini.
Pua berkata sejak Januari 2012, harga gula antarabangsa telah menjunam sehingga serendah US$16.70 setiap 100lbs pada September 2013 dan itu bermakna kerajaan telah membeli gula 55.7% lebih tinggi daripada harga pasaran bulan lalu. 
Katanya, kerajaan perlu bertanggungjawab kerana telah membuat keputusan tidak wajar dan menyusahkan rakyat Malaysia. 
“Ismail pada Januari tahun lalu bersikap angkuh apabila berkata 'biar saya ingatkan kamu bahawa kerajaan adalah bijak' kerana menandatangani perjanjian tiga tahun tersebut. Namun ia membuktikan keputusan tersebut adalah salah dan amat merugikan Malaysia.
“Kerajaan tidak boleh terus menggunakan alasan tidak munasabah untuk menjelaskan kenaikan harga gula.
“Punca kenaikan harga gula disebabkan kerajaan mengimport gula mentah bagi pihak pengilang gula dengan harga jauh lebih tinggi daripada harga pasaran. 
“Kerajaan perlu mengaku kesalahan yang dilakukan dengan menyiasat punca gula mentah diimport dengan harga lebih mahal dan mengumumkan dasar pemulihan yang akan dilaksanakan agar perkara yang menambahkan beban rakyat tidak akan diulangi pada masa hadapan,” katanya.

Mupok Aku



 

Monday, October 14, 2013

Three Muslim Court of Appeal Judges Forbidded the Word Allah from Being Used By Christians

Kuantan
Monday, 14th Oct 2013



Will this decision effect the formation of Malaysia?


The Catholic Church is banned from using the word "Allah" to refer to God in the Bahasa Malaysia section of its weekly newspaper, the Herald, the Court of Appeal ruled today.

A three-man bench chaired by Datuk Seri Mohamed Apandi Ali delivered the decision to a packed court room, ruling that Putrajaya’s appeal was allowed.

The church can appeal the decision in the Federal Court but it has to obtain leave by framing legal questions which are of public interest.


In an immediate reaction, The Herald editor Father Lawrence Andrew said he was disappointed with the decision.

He said the weekly would appeal against the decision at the Federal Court.

The Herald lawyer, S. Selvarajah, said he would continue with the next legal course of action as instructed by his client.

Apandi explained that the government did not violate the Church’s constitutional rights in banning the use of the word in The Herald.

"It is our common finding that the name Allah was not an integral part of the Christian faith and practice," he said.

"Such usage if allowed will enviably cause confusion within the community."

Apandi argued that the state and the people were of paramount importance, adding that the welfare of the individual and group must yield to the community.

"So the minister had sufficient material before him to ban The Herald from using the word.

"Thus, there is no plausible reason for the High Court to interfere with the minister's decision," said Apandi.

The judge who read a summary judgment said the Home Minister had acted within his powers to disallow the Catholic weekly from using the word “Allah” in its Bahasa Malaysia section.

“Our common finding that the use of Allah is not an integral part of the Christian faith, so we find no justification for why they insist on using the name or word in their publication,” he told a packed court room.

Putrajaya's lawyer, Suzana Atan, had on September 10 submitted before the judges that the Home Minister banned the use of the word Allah in the Herald on grounds of national security and public order.

She said the prohibition was ordered as it touched on Islamic religious sensitivity.

Suzana added that after the High Court ruling four years ago, there were several arson attempts on churches and an incident in which vandals tossed a pig’s head into a mosque.

She argued that the ban was actually a pre-emptive measure by the minister, adding that the use of the word by Catholics caused a lot of confusion among Muslims and Christians as it had a different meaning to both religious groups.

Suzana also told the court that the Home Minister had the absolute discretion under the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 to impose conditions when approving permits for publications.

Porres Royan, who appeared for the church, said the national security and public order argument by Putrajaya was an afterthought.

Royan went on to explain that in 1982 there was an exemption order where the word could be used in the Al-Kitab imported from Indonesia and also in the languages of the natives of Sabah and Sarawak.

He said the Herald had been using the word in its Bahasa Malaysia section since 1994.

Royan also said the government allowed the Al-Kitab in the Indonesian and Malay languages, which contained the word Allah, to be imported and printed in the country as part of the 10-point solution in April 2011.

The Allah row erupted in early 2009 when the Home Ministry threatened to revoke the Herald’s permit for using the word Allah to refer to God.

This action prompted the Catholic Church to sue the government for violating its constitutional rights.

On December 31, 2009, the High Court allowed the church's judicial review application and lifted the Home Minister's ban on the use of the word in the Herald.

Judge Lau Bee Lan said the church had a constitutional right to use the word Allah in its newspaper on the grounds that religions other than Islam can be practised in peace and harmony. - October 14, 2014.

Mupok Aku




Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Mengapa Perlu Ada Persatuan Veteran Tentera Negeri Sarawak (PVTMS) Apabila Kita Sudah Ada Persatuan Bekas Tentera Malaysia (PBTM)

Kuantan
Selasa, 1 Okt 2013

Saya ingin menyeru kepada semua anggota bekas tentera daripada Tentera Darat dan Udara agar tidak menyertai PVTMS yang ditubuhkan untuk kepentingan angota-anggota bekas Tentera Laut Malaysia semata-mata.

Setelah terbaca ruangan tahniah di dalam Borneo Post rasa terpanggil untuk menulis serta memberi ingatan kepada semua rakan-rakan bekas tentera baik pegawai ataupun daripada lain-lain pangkat.


 
Bukittnggal.Com. Kepada bekas pegawai dan anggota ATM kenapa harus menyertai PVTMS yang ditubuhkan oleh bekasa anggota TLDM sebab kita sudah ada PBTM.
 

Di kebelakangan ini saya dapati ada satu persatuan bekas Tentera Laut yang berpengkalan di Sibu yang cuba mengembangkan persatuan ke lain-lain bahagian seperti ke Kuching, Samarahan dan yang terbaharu ke Bahagian Limbang. Persatuan yang menamakan diri mereka sebagai Persatuan Veteran Tentera Malaysian Sarawak (PVTMS) sebenarnya adalah persatuan yang mewakili bekas anggota Tentera Laut Malaysia tetapi oleh kerana kekurangan anggota (pada pendapat saya) telah menggunakan nama veteran tentera, demi untuk mendapat jumlah keahlian yang ramai dengan yang demikian boleh mendapat geran kerajaan yang lebih banyak.

Bekas tentera di Sarawak seharusnya tidak terpengaruh dengan pujukan PVTMS untuk  menyertai persatuan berkenaan kerana kita sudah ada PBTM yang telah diiktiraf oleh kerajaan. Sekiranya bekas anggota TLDM mahu menubuhkan PVTMS lantaklah mereka. Tetapi kepada bekas-bekas tentera terutamanya bekas anggota TD seharusnya bijak menilai serta befikir kenapa harus meninggalkan PBTM yang mewakili dan diwakili oleh bekas TD untuk menyertai PVTMS yang mewakili serta diwakili oleh bekas anggota TLDM.

Untuk mendapat gambaran yang lebih jelas lagi, di sini saya ingin berkongsi keratan Ucapan Tahniah PVTMS sempena HAT. Daripada senarai ahli-ahli serta barisan kepimpinan PVTMS kita akan dapati bahawa majoriti daripada mereka adalah terdiri daripada bekas pegawai serta anggota-anggota TLDM. Jadi kepada anggota serta pegawai-pegawai bekas tentera terutamanya daripada Tentera Darat tepuk dada tanya selera.

Daripada sumber risikan Bukittunggal.com, sebelum penubuhan PVTMS, anggota serta bekas pegawai TLDM di Sibu telah menubuhkan Persatuan Bekas Tentera Laut DiRaja Malaysia (PBTL) tetapi kenapa akhirnya mereka menubuhkan PVTMS. Jawabannya ringkas untuk menambahkan bilangan ahli persatuan. Di Sibu atau di Sarawak ada berapa orangkah bekas anggota TLDM kalau dibandingkan dengan bekas anggota Tentera Darat. Jadi dengan penambahan bilangan anggota baka lebih banyaklah peruntukan geran yang boleh diperolehi oleh mereka. Tetapi oleh kerana persatuan ini pada dasarnya adalah untuk kebajikan bekas anggota TLDM, jadi tidak hairanlah kebanyakan bantuanpun akan disalurkan kepada bekas anggota TLDM.

Jadi oleh yang demikian demi perpaduan di kalangan bekas pegawai dan anggota Tentera Darat, saya ingin berpesan agar tuan-tuan tidak meninggalkan PBTM yang memperjuangkan kebajikan kita semua dan menyertai PVTMS yang cenderung   hanya memperjuangkan kebajikan anggota daripada satu cabang ATM sahaja iaitu bekas anggota TLDM.  

Kepada anggota PVTMS terutamanya yang terdiri daripada kaum Iban, cuba kaji keanggotaan Pemegang Jawatan di dalam PVTMS, di manakah kedudukan kelian? Tepuk dada tanya selera!

Mupok Aku

"Agi Idup Agi Ngelaban"



Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Pengawa bepilih PRU13 di Sarawak ari ti di peda aku

Wednesday, 1 May 2013
KUALA LUMPUR

 BN Sekali tu sigi abis di Sarawak


Meri selamat Ari Pekerja ngagai semua orang di dunya tu kelebih agi ngagai bala di menoa Malaysia tu. Nyadi baka ke sekali tu aku deka nulis pasal pengawa bepilih di menoa Sarawak ari utai ti diperati maia ke bisi pulai kin bepun ari 6 tu tadi ianya ari 27 April 2013 lalu pulai baru ke saritu. Lalu pia mega artikel tu ditulis aku dalam bus ekpress ke bejalai ari KL ke Kuantan. Lalu nguji ngena Galaxy Note 8.0 ti baru dikopak ari kotak. Ukai ga deka ngaga promo ke Galaxy Note 8.0. Aku udah ngena Galaxy Note 7100 serta Galaxy Tab 10.1 tetapi kedua-dua enda oleh enggau blogging banding enggau Galaxy Note 8.0. Nya alai ngagai bala blogger aku deka recommend Galaxy Note 8.0 ngagai kita.
Nyau lebih-lebih pula aku promo Galaxy Note 8.0 ukai Samsung bisi sponsor tauka meri duit ngagai Bukittunggal.com
Politik di Sarawak endang baka ke udah-udah nadai tentu maioh berubah ianya Melayu/Islam enggau bansa Iban Dayak agi deka ngundi ngagai BN lalu pia mega undi bansa Cina deka ngagai DAP tauka ngagai Pakatan Rakyat (PR) ke bukai.Tajapan BN deka menang ba tempat ti majoriti bansa Melay tauka Iban Dayak tang ke sekali tu BN deka dilaban habis-habis oleh PR. BN nadai oleh agi semina ngarap ke janji aja dikena narit  undi tang mega mesti nurun lalu betemu enggau bala pengundi. Leboh ti betemu enggau siko-dua pengundi di P202 dia sida madah kebuah ke agi deka ngundi laban ti takut nadai diberi pemansang. Nyadi pemansang ti ko sidanya tadi pemansang ari  Minor Rural Projek (MRP) .Nyadi baka sida bisi ngembuan penemu tu laban sida bedau tentu "confident" PR oleh menang ke sekali tu. Nyadi ya ti kedua nama kebuah BN tau menang di menoa pesisir tauka menua dikembuan Melayu enggau Iban Dayak laban ti nadai pengawa kempen digaga oleh PR. Baka di P202 sapa ti bisi ngelala tudah pengari ari PR? Tambah agi baka di menoa kami Empaling nadai poster ari PR digantung din. Setuju aku menoa nya nadai maioh penyokong PR tang nya nadai bereti kitai tau enda iboh ngantong poster. Ari segi kempen pengari ari Independent enggau Sarawak Workers Party (SWP) jauh lebih manah ari pengari PR. Siti agi kebuah nama kebuah PR pedih deka menang laban undi  pembangkang udah dipecah ke oleh Parti SWP serta BN's friendly candidates, ianya serpih sida ari Parti SPDP ti disokong Taib Mahmud.
Nyadi baka pengawa ngundi tu deka dipejalai ke dalam kandang 4 hari tu lalu bisi alai 3 ari endor kempen. Kelebih ari ti berati ke pengawa nyibor duit ngagai orang rumah panjai oleh BN, dalam kandang tu mega PR mesti kempen ngagai semua rumah panjai baik ke penyokong PR tauka enda.
Pengujung ia aku arap ke bala pengundi kelebih agi ngagai bala iban ngingat ke tu :
Undi BN undi Taib
Undi Taib kitai Iban nyadi kampar di tanah diri
Undi BN undi Najib
Undi Najib kitai Iban nadai tau ngena jako Allah dalam kitab Injil.
Enti enggai utai ti di atas tu nyadi...BAH KITAI NGUNDI PR

Mupok aku baru datai di Kuantan tu

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU13) - Bakani Ka Narit Undi Iban-Dayak Bagi Ke-1

Sunday, 14th April 2013
Kuantan, Pahang


Kitai Iban-Dayak Mesti Berani Ngelaban Raja Sarawak Tu!
Enti ka boleh sokong ari orang Rumah Panjai, orang ti kempen ke parti PR mesti oleh convince orang rumah panjai Lalu nunjuk ke tanda tu ngagai orang BN.


Kitai Iban tauka bansa Dayak ke bukai patut ia baka maia ke diatu udah nemu diri dikelinyai perintah Barisan Nasional. Kitai ukai semina tinggal ari pemansang menoa, pelajar tauka penatai pemisi tang utai ti pemadau berega tauka pengaya ba kitai ianya tanah kitai baka tanah pemuda serta tanah ti endor kitai berumah pan abis dirampas perintah Taib Mahmud. Nya alai enti kitai enggai agi diperinsa perintah BN maia pengawa bepilih ke sekali tu meh kitai muai sida. Nya alai aram kitai kelebih agi bala Iban-Dayak ti diau di Sarawak ngerembai ke utai ti ditulis aku tu ngagai bala aki-inek, apai-indai,bala menyadi serta kaban ti diau di menoa pesisir awak ke menoa kitai Sarawak ke sekali tu dipegai parti Pakatan Rakyat (PR).
 
Baka ke selama tiap-tiap hari maia pulai bekerja aku selalu bejako dalam talipaun enggau indai aku nanya ke berita serta pengerai ia. Dua-tiga ari ke lepas aku bisi limpang mimit nanya ia pasal pengawa bepilih di menua kami di Empaling, Sg Tenggang. Utai ti ditanya aku nya pasal pengawa kempen oleh parti-parti BN tauka PR serta enggau tunga sokong orang menua kami. Baka pilihanraya ke udah mega nitih ke padah indai aku nadai bisi orang udah kempen ngagai menoa kami baik ari BN tauka PR. Pia mega ari segi sokong, nitih ke padah indai aku orang di menua kami endang rata-rata sigi agi nyukong "Perintah". Nya alai enti baka PR ka bulih sukong ari bala ke diau di rumah panjai dua perkara tu mesti diperati ka ianya pengawa kempen serta bakani ko kitai ka ngakis mentaliti "BN=Perintah" ari orang ke diau di rumah panjai.
 
Orang Iban-Dayak Sanggup diau ba rumah panjai ti baka tu ari ti ngelaban "Perintah " BN!

Pengawa kempen ngagai rumah panjai mesti di atur enggau manah serta "logistic support" baka Public Address (PA) system mesti cukup. Enti kempen semina nganjong batang tuboh aja nama guna. Anang ngumbai orang rumah panjai nadai "first impression" leboh ti meda penatai orang ti kempen. Ari pengawa kempen ke bisi dipejalai ke bala kami maia pilihanraya DUN Sarawak 2011 tu tadi aku meda kempen ti dipejalai ke nadai bisi sistematik serta logistic support ti cukop. Bala sida PA, power supply tauka generator pan nadai bisi. Uji kitai empu nyadi penerima bala kempen ti baka kami sebuat nya tadi nama first impression kita? Setuju. Kita mesti nadai bisi confident meda bala ke datai kempen. Enti udah kempen pan nadai digaga enggau manah bakani ko bala orang rumah panjai deka ngundi kitai. Nya alai baka ngenang pengawa kempen kami nyin tadi maioh orang datai ngulu tang maia bepilih semina 2 tauka 3 iko aja ti bisi ngundi pengari kami.
Pia mega siti agi utai ti beguna amai maia kempen ngagai rumah panjai tu strategi. Baka ngenang pengawa kempen  kami sebuat nyin tadi, nadai bisi strategi. Utai ti deka dikejako ke tak nitih ke utai ti bisi dalam ontak lalu sebarang pansut aja. Sepatut ia bala ti kempen mesti bisi udah besedia ari segi isu tauka utai ti deka dipansut ke. Enti baka orang ti sepatut ia nyadi ke cunto kempen, aku berasai rindu meda cara menyadi kitai ari Parti Democratic Action Party (DAP) berkempen. Sapa-sapa ti kala nitih ke ceramah parti DAP tu mesti besetuju enggau aku. Parti DAP tiap-tiap ceramah sida utai ti pemadu manahnya ari segi   logistic Support sida. Sida deka beguna ke PA serta stage ti manah siap enggau projector. Pia mega baka isu tauka buah jako ti dipantai ke sida tau narit bala pengundi. Nama kebuah kitai Iban-Dayak enda oleh nitih ke penemu DAP ari segi bekempen?
Peda Gaya orang DAP berkempen. Uji kita bekempen ngagai rumah panjai bakatu!
 
Pekara ke-dua ti deka dipansut ke aku ke  sekali tu ianya pasal orang rumah panjai ti nganggap BN tu tadi perintah. Sekali pandang ko orang Laut kitai selalu nyalah orang rumah panjai taja pan nemu diri dikelinyai ke BN tang agi mega deka ngundi BN. Di menoa endor aku bekerja ditu pan orang masih nganggap orang "Sarawak bodoh" laban ti nyadi kubu-kuat BN tajapan ari segi pemansang Sarawak jauh tinggal. Tang enti kitai meda ke belakang sokong kitai Iban-Dayak, dia kitai deka nemu Iban-Dayak tu ari segi politik endang kuat. Tang kitai Iban-Dayak majak lemi ari segi politik udah Insiden Ming Court dititih ke PBDS masuk BN serta pengujung parti PBDS tu ditutup. Maia PBDS agi kuat ngari ke kitai Iban-Dayak, kitai Iban di rumah panjai endang sigi kuat amai nyukong PBDS laban parti tu endang ngering ke kitai Iban-Dayak. Maia PBDS agi nyadi pembangkang di peringkat DUN lalu enggau BN di Parlimen, Taib Mahmud nadai berani negu tanah kitai Iban-Dayak. Lalu kitai Iban-Dayak semakin lemi dalam politik udah PBDS masuk BN. Lalu pia mega maia PBDS agi nyadi pembangkang rumah panjai kitai Iban diukum Taib nadai diberi pemansang. Nya alai maia tu maioh amai rumah panjai kitai Iban putus. Uji kitai meda menoa ke sebelah tisi jalai ti maioh putus semua ia ketegal PBDS ti nyadi pembangkang lalu masuk dalam BN baru. Nya alai kitai Iban ti diau di rumah panjai sampai ke diatu agi fobia nadai diberi pemansang oleh Taib Mahmud serta takut nadai ngundi "parti perintah" BN. Taja sida ngundi BN tang ukai nya reti iya sida rindu ke BN. Nya alai enti baka PR deka menang undi orang rumah panjai, maia kempen mesti kempen betul-betul, cukup sedia ari segi "logistic support" serta isu ti deka dipansut ke. Ngena simpati baka jako madah ke PR nadai duit tauka ngumpul derma ari orang maioh engka efektif di nengeri (bandar)  tang enti kempen ngagai rumah panjai strategi tu nadai tau dikena. Sapa-sapa ti kempen ngagai rumah panjai mesti oleh "convince" orang rumah panjai sida ia cukup duit serta utai bukai dikena niri ke perintah. Enti PR deka berdiri di tempat-tempat majoriti Iban-Dayak sida mesti bersedia ari segi "logistic Support". strategi serta  duit. Enti nadai ketiga-tiga utai tu tadi, manah agi PR anang ngelaban terus laban enti nadai cukup besedia tu deka nambah ke pengerosak politik orang Iban-Dayak.
Lalu naka tu dulu buah karang aku ke sekali tu. Ba bagi ti deka datai akau deka nyebut isu ti tau dikena PR kena kempen ngelaban BN di rumah panjai.

Mupok Aku


 
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Chitika

BlogTopsites

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

MyBlogLog

Google Rank

Alexa Ranking

Technorati

BlogSearch Engine

BlogRanking

Politics Blogs - Blog Rankings